Michael Zeleny (larvatus) wrote,
Michael Zeleny


Walter Laqueur serves up a stunning venture into counterfactual history. Although its premiss stands at odds with the analysis of imperial decay through ethnic strife by the founder of its genre, Laqueur’s narrative supports the underlying program of construing plausibility as the basis for understanding causation in history and political science. Curiously enough, for all current reaction to its conclusions, no one appears to have drawn a parallel with Tony Judt’s muchly maligned advocacy of Israel’s conversion into a binational and secular state. The take-away lesson is that bitter pills are better savored in wistful hindsight than grim foreboding.
Tags: history, jews, politics, violence

  • the joys of approximation

    In stark contrast to rightwing claims, 93% of demonstrations have involved no serious harm to people or property. — Lois Beckett, “ Nearly all Black…

  • the ethics of discrimination, part I

    In Politics III.9.1280a7–22, Aristotle agrees with the thought that equality is just, but points out that it is not so for everybody, but…

  • brace yourselves for a plethora of hurt feelings

    Spence (Sean Bean): You ever kill anybody? Sam (Robert De Niro): I hurt somebody’s feelings once. — Ronin, written by J.D. Zeik and…

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded